“Satire or Serious?” Part II

A week ago I posted an article about the teaching of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and then provided my own response. Today I read a rebuttal to the original article. I’d love to hear your reactions.

The N-word and Huckleberry Finn

I’ve been thinking about the rueful resignation on the part of the high school English teacher who wrote recently that he could no longer teach “Huckleberry Finn” and several other classic novels because they contained words offensive to minority populations (“Time to update schools’ reading lists,” Jan. 6).

He was sad that the N-word got in the way, but he was sensitive to his students’ feelings and also believed there were equally good contemporary books that were less inflammatory. I taught the novel for almost 25 years in schools in the South, at first in segregated classes and then in schools that were made up of white and black high school juniors. I agree, it’s not a comfortable novel to teach.

In response, one of the P-I readers wrote that when her children brought the novel home from school, she wondered, “Are they still teaching that?” — implying that because it is old, the book is no longer relevant.

Be assured, I’m not one of those old English teachers lined up outside high schools in rocking chairs to protect our youth from contemporary thought. There are many wonderful novels, by men and women, that high school English classes should read together and enjoy.

But there are also several classics they shouldn’t miss. The reason a work of art is labeled classic, after all, is because it speaks to all ages. And sometimes the truths it speaks are harsh and uncomfortable.

“Huckleberry Finn,” the novel Hemingway described as the progenitor of all American fiction, traces the moral development of an adolescent boy on an archetypal journey toward adulthood. That Huck doesn’t actually complete his journey, but at the end “lights out for the territories” away from corrupting civilization is wonderful fodder for classroom discussion.

And that Twain has the immature Huck, as well as the book’s most unenlightened and/or vile characters, use the N- word along the way emphasizes the moral journey that Huck is on. The nature of those who use the word is its greatest indictment.

I personally can’t think of a better book to read with adolescents who are struggling with the concepts of “Otherness,” in a wide context in their lives. The use of the N-word offers the careful teacher a perfect chance to open the discussion.

“Huckleberry Finn” is a tough, rewarding, rollickingly funny, poignant book. It is educational in the classic sense: it deals with immutable truths. I would hate it if my grandchildren were denied the opportunity to read it and discuss it and argue it and challenge it and savor it in a class with other adolescents who are themselves making Huck’s journey.

Nancy K. Wiesner lives in Seattle.

Here is the original source if you missed it above.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on ““Satire or Serious?” Part II

  1. Clix

    Viewing a requirement as “an opportunity” takes a great deal of maturity.

    Also? I really don’t think that there is ANY novel that is SO important and influential and life-improving that everyone should be required to read it. The ONLY book for which I would remotely make that claim is the Bible, and even then, to gain the most from it, reading it should be a matter of choice, not command.

    I would hope that if a group of students CHOSE to read and study Huck, that they would be welcome to do so in any school. But as I study and watch and learn, I am slowly becoming convinced that student choice really is a good deal more significant than we’ve realized.

    Reply
  2. Nuss

    But we can’t leave everything up to choice, right? I’ve had plenty of examples of teaching novels or stories or poems that kids were absolutely sure they were going to hate, only to have them fall in love with them by the end. As educators, we bear the responsibility of not only deciding what’s important for kids to know, but for guiding them in a way that is meaningful.

    That’s why I could not agree more with the letter above; we do no one a service by ignoring our history and failing to grapple with its meaning as reflected through art — especially when the themes are as relevant today as they ever were.

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Deception, Not Satire « The Doc Is In

  4. Pingback: Deception, Not Satire « The Doc Is In

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s