Monthly Archives: January 2010

The Great Debate

Over at the Seattle Times a blog post from Ed Cetera has sparked some conversation around the water cooler in our English Department. In the posting Ed Cetera wonders why people love J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye, and then he mentions his love for Twain’s Huck Finn over Salinger’s Holden Caulfield.

I believe it’s a difficult comparison to make since the two novels are so vastly different. While Huck journeys south, Twain uses Huck’s experiences to comment on the inhumane treatment of humans, the need for human equality, and the importance of education. However, Salinger seems to want a young protagonist to point out how superficial and “phony” society has become. Holden searches for something real while Huck searches for a reason to remain in society; still, both seem to be looking for their places in the world.

Feel free to weigh in on here or on the comments section of the Seattle Times blog post. Either way, I’m curious to hear what you have to say.

South Carolina and Its Modest Proposal

Swift’s ingeniously written (and ironic) essay “A Modest Proposal” has no business being in the same sentence as South Carolina Lt. Governor Andre Bauer. However, if you haven’t read Swift’s satirical work recently, it begins with this:

A Modest Proposal for preventing the children of poor people in Ireland, from being a burden on their parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the publick.

Swift then proceeds to suggest, among other things, that dining on the growing poverty-stricken population is a potential solution. I couldn’t help but think of it after hearing Bauer’s comments about the poor in his state, except that he reminded me of the student who is horrified while reading Swift’s essay because he missed the author’s use of irony. But Bauer’s comments are no laughing matter. Here is part of the controversial statement he provided the other day:

“My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed. You’re facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don’t think too much further than that. And so what you’ve got to do is you’ve got to curtail that type of behavior. They don’t know any better.”

After looking at the rest of his remarks, I see what he was trying to say, but his emphasis on the words, “Because they breed” was a bit chilling. His remarks do seem to suggest that the poor are similar, in some way, to animals and that cutting off their access to food is a possible solution. Even if some believe Bauer’s intentions were good, his positively poor choice of analogy destroyed his message.

I can’t imagine telling a student, “Timmy, you can’t eat lunch because your mom couldn’t come to parent-teacher conferences” or “Sally, you can’t have breakfast since the governor thinks your dad is a dead-beat.”

Hyperbole aside though, kids don’t choose their parents or the situations in which they enter the world, and I have a strong suspicion that Lt. Governor Bauer’s message was lost because of this enormous gaffe. If he really thinks of people in such a manner, I fear for the needy in his state.

I had a friend of mine whose mother refused government assistance, and his cupboards were regularly bare. He recalled being given warm water to drink for dinner instead of cold water because the warm water made him “feel fuller.” It was a teacher who kept granola bars in her desk for him, so he could have breakfast every school day. (This is why I keep them in my desk now as well.)

On a personal note, the greatest irony to me in this entire debacle is not Bauer’s unthinking comments–I know many people who judge others without fully understanding the judged–but the idea that he’s advocating potentially reducing services at a time in modern history when those services may be the most needed. He was already a controversial person in his state, and this may be associated with him for the rest of his political career.

Only One Parent Is Needed

That’s right. Only one parent needs to complain to entice an entire school district to remove dictionaries from schools. Nope, this isn’t a Fark.com news item (yet as far as I know). This is an entire school district removing a specific edition of dictionaries because the term “oral sex” is in them.

How ridiculous is this?

I know someone will probably mention that maybe elementary kids are too young for these dictionaries, but I remember looking up worse terms than this as a kid and not even understanding the definitions! Besides, the internet provides pictures, so I’m thinking the dictionary is safer.

Sometimes I just think people are looking for something to do.

Update: I just saw the article on Fark. :)

A Record High

According to a new study, American children average 7.5 hours per day using some type of electronic device, and 11 hours worth crammed into that 7.5 if you include texting and multitasking.

“I feel like my days would be boring without it,” said Francisco Sepulveda, a 14-year-old Bronx eighth grader who uses his smart phone to surf the Web, watch videos, listen to music — and send or receive about 500 texts a day.

My first thought every time I see a student texting is: “What in the world do they have to say every minute?” When I ask my students they just giggle and say “nothing” or “just stuff,” which to me signals that they are talking about nothing. I asked my 1st period students if I was right, and they basically confirmed it.

Of course, we see the effects of all this media immersion:

[The study] found, moreover, that heavy media use is associated with several negatives, including behavior problems and lower grades…[and] other studies have established a link between screen time and obesity.

While most of the young people in the study got good grades, 47 percent of the heaviest media users — those who consumed at least 16 hours a day — had mostly C’s or lower, compared with 23 percent of those who typically consumed media three hours a day or less. The heaviest media users were also more likely than the lightest users to report that they were bored or sad, or that they got into trouble, did not get along well with their parents and were not happy at school.

While the effects of the students’ immersion into media seem to be commonsense reasoning or just a predictable conclusion, it also confirms that students have taken to their plugged in lifestyles more and more meaning that unplugging them me be impossible. As teachers, we may just have to accept that our students will be forever after connected.

I do tend to think sometimes that we need a major media outage like in The Cable Guy with Jim Carrey and Matthew Broderick where the TVs go out, and one character reaches for a book. Of course, now it would be a Kindle.